gui: label Explorer transaction fees with their unit #27

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-08-26 19:07:04 +00:00 by ignotusnemo · 1 comment

ignotusnemo commented

2026-08-26 19:07:04 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Problem

The wide Explorer transaction table renders fee_micronoid as a raw integer under a bare FEE heading, while adjacent amounts are formatted in NOID and the Send form explicitly uses NOID. The inconsistent presentation makes the unit unclear.

Expected

Display the fee with an explicit unit and use the same convention consistently across Explorer, Mining, Proofs and Send. Either label the raw value as μNOID or format it as NOID.

Scope

This is a display and unit-consistency issue. It does not change transaction encoding, fee validation or consensus.

Originally reported by @AGI-is-going-to-arrive and moved here for normal public issue tracking.

## Problem The wide Explorer transaction table renders `fee_micronoid` as a raw integer under a bare `FEE` heading, while adjacent amounts are formatted in NOID and the Send form explicitly uses NOID. The inconsistent presentation makes the unit unclear. ## Expected Display the fee with an explicit unit and use the same convention consistently across Explorer, Mining, Proofs and Send. Either label the raw value as `μNOID` or format it as NOID. ## Scope This is a display and unit-consistency issue. It does not change transaction encoding, fee validation or consensus. Originally reported by @AGI-is-going-to-arrive and moved here for normal public issue tracking.

ignotusnemo commented

2026-08-26 20:31:27 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Fixed in 6e84c930: Explorer now labels fees explicitly and formats them in NOID in both wide and compact views.

Fixed in [`6e84c930`](https://github.com/ignotusnemo/parano1d/commit/6e84c930): Explorer now labels fees explicitly and formats them in NOID in both wide and compact views.